David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (2):251 - 273 (1999)
Hobbes's central insight about ethics was that it should not be understood to require that we make ourselves a prey for others. It is this insight that both varieties of contractarianism [Hobbesian and Kantian] respect. Consider a relationship between two human beings that exists for reasons of either love or duty; let us also suppose that it is a relationship that can be instrumentally valuable to both parties. In order for that relationship to receive our full moral endorsement, we must ask whether either party uses the duty or the love connecting them in a way that affects the other party's ability to realize the instrumental value from that relationship. To be sure, good marriages and good friendships ought not to be centrally concerned with the question of justice, but they must also be, at the very least, relationships in which love or duty are not manipulated by either party in order to use the other party to her detriment
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peter Vallentyne (1989). Contractarianism and the Assumption of Mutual Unconcern. Philosophical Studies 56 (2):187 - 192.
Citations of this work BETA
Jeremy Neill (forthcoming). The Gauthier Contract: Applicable or Not? Res Publica:1-22.
Similar books and articles
Paul Formosa (2011). Kant on the Highest Moral-Physical Good: The Social Aspect of Kant's Moral Philosophy. Kantian Review 15 (1):1-36.
Melissa Seymour Fahmy (2010). Kantian Practical Love. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):313-331.
Daniel Howard-Snyder (1996). The Argument From Divine Hiddenness. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):433 - 453.
Frederick R. Bauer (2004). The Essence of Ethics. Ambassador Books, Inc..
Walter E. Schaller (1992). The Relation of Moral Worth to the Good Will in Kant's Ethics. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:351-382.
S. Matthew Liao (2006). The Idea of a Duty to Love. Journal of Value Inquiry 40 (1):1-22.
Mark R. Reiff (2009). Proportionality, Winner-Take-All, and Distributive Justice. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (1):5-42.
Alice MacLachlan (2008). Forgiveness and Moral Solidarity. In Stephen Bloch-Shulman & David White (eds.), Forgiveness: Probing the Boundaries. Inter-Disciplinary Press
Joyce Kloc McClure (2003). Seeing Through the Fog: Love and Injustice in "Bleak House". Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (1):23 - 44.
Carolyn Price (2012). What is the Point of Love? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (2):217-237.
Oren Hasson, Dan Cohen & Avi Shmida (1992). Providing or Hiding Information: On the Evolution of Amplifiers and Attenuators of Perceived Quality Differences. Acta Biotheoretica 40 (4):269-283.
Preston N. Williams (1990). An Analysis of the Conception of Love and Its Influence on Justice in the Thought of Martin Luther King, Jr. Journal of Religious Ethics 18 (2):15 - 31.
David Owens (2012). The Value of Duty. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1):199-215.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads19 ( #243,576 of 1,940,952 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #149,625 of 1,940,952 )
How can I increase my downloads?