David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Argumentation 24 (4):423-452 (2010)
A campaign to pass city council resolutions opposing an American invasion of Iraq in the Fall of 2002 and Spring of 2003 provided an opportunity to examine contrasting styles of public argument. This paper examines an extensive set of news and editorial articles as well as the actual deliberations before city councils. An argument’s style constructs a relationship between the speaker, audience, and issue through the strategic use of language. Two conflicting styles of argument were apparent in these deliberations: a protest style and a dissent style. Each style operated within a different normative frame that managed tensions between unity and division, participation and its lack, and inclusive and exclusive reasoning. While protest and dissent styles conflict, each frames important relationships for public discourse and deliberation.
|Keywords||Style Argumentation Public deliberation War Iraq Discourse analysis|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Chantal Mouffe (2002). The Democratic Paradox. Political Theory 30 (6):862-864.
Chantal Mouffe (1999). Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism? Social Research 66 (3):745-758.
Iris Marion Young (2001). Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy. Political Theory 29 (5):670-690.
John W. Delicath & Kevin Michael Deluca (2003). Image Events, the Public Sphere, and Argumentative Practice: The Case of Radical Environmental Groups. Argumentation 17 (3):315-333.
John S. Dryzek (1990). Discursive Democracy Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mary Douglas (1996). Thought Styles: Critical Essays on Good Taste. Sage Publications.
Jacques Derrida (1978/1979). Spurs: Nietzsche's Styles = Eperons: Les Styles De Nietzsche. University of Chicago Press.
William J. Rapaport (2011). How to Study: A Brief Guide. World Wide Web.
Dominic Lopes (1992). Pictures, Styles and Purposes. British Journal of Aesthetics 32 (4):330-341.
Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther (2005). An Obstacle to Unification in Biological Social Science: Formal and Compositional Styles of Science. Graduate Journal of Social Science 2 (2):40-100.
Rom Harré (2010). Causal Concepts in Chemical Vernaculars. Foundations of Chemistry 12 (2):101-115.
John Wettersten (1995). Styles of Rationality. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (1):69-98.
Brian T. Anderson (2012). Ayahuasca as Antidepressant? Psychedelics and Styles of Reasoning in Psychiatry. Anthropology of Consciousness 23 (1):44-59.
Holger Thesleff (1967). Studies in the Styles of Plato. Helsinki, Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Kirjapaino.
Conor O'Leary & Jenny Stewart (2013). The Interaction of Learning Styles and Teaching Methodologies in Accounting Ethical Instruction. Journal of Business Ethics 113 (2):225-241.
Mieke Boon (2011). Two Styles of Reasoning in Scientific Practices: Experimental and Mathematical Traditions. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):255 - 278.
Added to index2011-05-11
Total downloads4 ( #404,802 of 1,724,882 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,126 of 1,724,882 )
How can I increase my downloads?