David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):83-98 (2002)
Solving complex socio-technical problems, this paper claims, involves diverse knowledges (cognitive diversity), competing interests (social diversity), and pragmatism. To explain this view, this paper first explores two different cases: Canadian pulp and paper mill pollution and siting nuclear reactors in seismically sensitive areas of California. Solving such socio-technically complex problems involves cognitive diversity as well as social diversity and pragmatism. Cognitive diversity requires one to not only recognize relevant knowledges but also to assess their validity. Finally, it is suggested, integrating the resultant set of diverse relevant and valid knowledges determines the parameters of the solution space for the problem.
|Keywords||problem-solving knowledge expertise diverse interests engineering risk sociotechnical pragmatism pluralism stakeholders nuclear reactors pollution organochlorines paper mills NRC ethical complexity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jacques Ellul (1964). The Technological Society. New York, Knopf.
Vassilios N. Kazakidis & Rachel F. C. Haliburton (1998). The Mining Engineer, Moral Luck, and Professional Accountability. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (4):437-456.
Caroline Whitbeck (1992). The Trouble With Dilemmas. Professional Ethics, a Multidisciplinary Journal 1 (1-2):119-142.
Harry Hummels (1999). Ethical Challenges in a Technological Environment: The Perspective of Engineers Versus Managers. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):55-72.
Citations of this work BETA
Stephanie J. Bird (2002). Science and Technology for the Good of Society? Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):3-4.
Vincent di Norcia (2005). Intellectual Property and the Commercialization of Research and Development. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):203-219.
Vincent Norcia (2005). Intellectual Property and the Commercialization of Research and Development. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):203-219.
Similar books and articles
Amy Mullin (1995). Selves, Diverse and Divided: Can Feminists Have Diversity Without Multiplicity? Hypatia 10 (4):1 - 31.
Maeve O'Donovan (2010). Cognitive Diversity in the Global Academy: Why the Voices of Persons with Cognitive Disabilities Are Vital to Intellectual Diversity. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):171-185.
Nicholas Maxwell (1980). Science, Reason, Knowledge, and Wisdom: A Critique of Specialism. Inquiry 23 (1):19 – 81.
Joseph J. Fins, Matthew D. Bacchetta & Franklin G. Miller (1997). Clinical Pragmatism: A Method of Moral Problem Solving. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (2):129-143.
Charles Hampden-Turner & Ginger Chih (2011). Dilemmas Of Diversity: A New Paradigm of Integrating Diversity. World Futures 66 (3):192-218.
Charles Hampden-Turner & Ginger Chih (2010). Dilemmas of Diversity: A New Paradigm of Integrating Diversity. World Futures 66 (3 & 4):192 – 218.
João Arriscado Nunes (2007). Pathways to Cosmopolitan Knowledges : In the Aftermath of the Discourse on the Sciences. In Boaventura de Sousa Santos (ed.), Cognitive Justice in a Global World: Prudent Knowledges for a Decent Life. Lexington Books
Ellen Messer-Davidow, David R. Shumway & David Sylvan (eds.) (1993). Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. University Press of Virginia.
Alvin I. Goldman (1983). Epistemology and the Theory of Problem Solving. Synthese 55 (1):21 - 48.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #314,241 of 1,940,944 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,798 of 1,940,944 )
How can I increase my downloads?