Epistemics of the holocaust considering the question of “why?” And of “how?”
| Abstract | The Holocaust was a rupture in civilisation – a Zivilisationsbruch –, a shattering of ontological certainty. The perception of the event enshrined in the notion of “rupture in civilisation” is the result of both the historical and the conceptual engagement with the event. Its manifest content seeks to combine two ways of discerning which are in fact opposed to one another: a particular one and a universal one. The particular perspective reflects the experience undergone by Jews as Jews of having been destroyed everywhere and solely because of their belonging, i.e. because of their alleged origin. It was hence the experience of being exposed to total extermination without any reason. Never before had anything of this kind taken place: a rupture in civilisation, carried out upon the Jews. The significance of the concept is further-reaching, however. The concept of rupture in civilisation seeks to denote the indeed singular circumstance of the extermination of human persons by human persons as the transgression of all the ethical and instrumental limits of comportment which had hitherto been considered as certain and secure. Transgression of this kind marks a rupture in civilisation that is carried out upon all humankind. The phenomenon of the crime against humanity experienced by the Jews can, however, be split and regarded from those two opposing perspectives: one that argues historically and that is above all adopted by the victims, while the other is an anthropologically inclined perception of the events which rather reaches further into a universal domain. The latter focuses on the significance of the events for the species as such. These perspectives are necessarily unequal. They may even work against other. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPaul E. Nahme (2012). The Jews as a Chosen People: Tradition and Transformation. Philosophy East and West 62 (1):139-144.
Michael L. Morgan (1984). Jewish Ethics After the Holocaust. Journal of Religious Ethics 12 (2):256 - 277.
F. R. Ankersmit (2005). Sublime Historical Experience. Stanford University Press.
Brett Bowden (2004). The Ideal of Civilisation: Its Origins and Socio‐Political Character. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (1):25-50.
Jacob R. Boersema & Noam Schimmel (2008). Challenging Dutch Holocaust Education: Towards a Curriculum Based on Moral Choices and Empathetic Capacity. Ethics and Education 3 (1):57-74.
Jacob R. Boersema & Noam Schimmel (2008). Challenging Dutch Holocaust Education: Towards a Curriculum Based on Moral Choices and Empathetic Capacity. Ethics and Education 3 (1):57-74.
Charles R. Gallagher (2009). The Papacy, The Jews, and the Holocaust. By Frank J. Coppa, Pius XII, The Holocaust, and the Cold War. By Michael Phayer and The Holy See and Hitler's Germany. By Gerhard Besier. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 50 (6):1063-1066.
Timothy M. Costelloe (2003). The Invisibility of Evil: Moral Progress and the 'Animal Holocaust'. Philosophical Papers 32 (2):109-131.
Eva Fleischner (1988). Catholics in France Who Saved Jews During the Holocaust. Philosophy and Theology 3 (1):45-56.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #133,637 of 549,695 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
