New reproductive technologies, ethics and gender: The legislative process in Brazil
Developing World Bioethics 2 (2):144–158 (2002)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLawrence M. Hinman (2005). Contemporary Moral Issues: Diversity and Consensus. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Robert Sparrow (2008). Is It “Every Man's Right to Have Babies If He Wants Them”?: Male Pregnancy and the Limits of Reproductive Liberty. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (3):pp. 275-299.
Colin Gavaghan (2010). A Whole New... You? 'Personal Identity', Emerging Technologies and the Law. Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):423-434.
Daniel Sperling (2012). Socializing the Public: Invoking Hannah Arendt's Critique of Modernity to Evaluate Reproductive Technologies. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):53-60.
Mark Greene (2009). Choosing Future People: Reproductive Technologies and Identity. In Vardit Ravitsky, Autumn Fiester & Arthur L. Caplan (eds.), The Penn Center Guide to Bioethics. Springer Publishing Company.
Maura Anne Ryan (1995). The New Reproductive Technologies: Defying God's Dominion? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (4):419-438.
Thérèse Murphy (2009). The Texture of Reproductive Choice : Law, Ethnography, and Reproductive Technologies. In Thérèse Murphy (ed.), New Technologies and Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #145,547 of 549,069 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
