David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (10):651-652 (2009)
In a previous paper, I had argued that Strong’s counterexamples to Marquis’s argument against abortion—according to which terminating fetuses is wrong because it deprives them of a valuable future—fail either because they have no bearing on Marquis’s argument or because they make unacceptable claims about what constitutes a valuable future. In this paper I respond to Strong’s criticism of my argument according to which I fail to acknowledge that Marquis uses "future like ours" and "valuable future" interchangeably. I show that my argument does not rely on not acknowledging that "future like ours" and "valuable future" are interchangeable; and that, rather, it is exactly by replacing "future like ours" with "valuable future" that I construct my argument against Strong. I conclude with some remarks on how Marquis’s concept of "future like ours" should be interpreted.
|Keywords||abortion Marquis future like ours|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ezio Di Nucci (2013). Embryo Loss and Double Effect. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):537-540.
Ezio Di Nucci (2013). Withdrawing Artificial Nutrition and Patients' Interests. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):555-556.
Similar books and articles
C. Strong (2012). Reply to Marquis: How Things Stand with the 'Future Like Ours' Argument. Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (9):567-569.
C. Strong (2008). A Critique of “the Best Secular Argument Against Abortion”. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
Ezio Di Nucci (2009). Abortion: Strong's Counterexamples Fail. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):304-305.
Alex Rajczi (2009). Abortion, Competing Entitlements, and Parental Responsibility. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):379-395.
Peter Nichols (2012). Abortion, Time-Relative Interests, and Futures Like Ours. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):493-506.
Donald Wilson (2007). Abortion, Persons, and Futures of Value. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):86-97.
Robert Lane (2003). Why I Was Never a Zygote. Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):63-83.
Andrew J. Peach (2005). A Natural Response to Boonin. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):357-376.
Nathan Nobis (2002). Who Needs the ’Actual Futures Pr/Nciple’?: Harmon on Abortion. Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (2):55-63.
C. Strong (2009). Reply to Di Nucci: Why the Counterexamples Succeed. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):326-327.
Added to index2009-10-01
Total downloads86 ( #17,732 of 1,413,300 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #30,081 of 1,413,300 )
How can I increase my downloads?