Withdrawing artificial nutrition and patients' interests

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):555-556 (2013)
Abstract
I argue that the arguments brought by Counsel for M to the English Court of Protection are morally problematic in prioritising subjective interests that are the result of ‘consistent autonomous thought’ over subjective interests that are the result of a more limited cognitive perspective
Keywords euthanasia  medical ethics  artificial nutrition  higher and lower pleasures
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Ezio Di Nucci, Withdrawing artificial nutrition and patients' interests
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Ezio Di Nucci (2009). Abortion: Strong's Counterexamples Fail. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):304-305.
John Stuart Mill (1962). Utilitarianism. Cleveland, World Pub. Co..
Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
V. English (2006). Withdrawing Artificial Ventilation. Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (8):495-496.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-09-01

Total downloads

48 ( #28,766 of 1,089,064 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #42,757 of 1,089,064 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.