Journal of Business Ethics 83 (3):365 - 368 (2008)
|Abstract||This article briefly review the fundamentals of structural equation modeling for readers unfamiliar with the technique then goes on to offer a review of the Martin and Cullen paper. In summary, a number of fit indices reported by the authors reveal that the data do not fit their theoretical model and thus the conclusion of the authors that the model was “promising” are unwarranted.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Suzanne C. Wagner & G. Lawrence Sanders (2001). Considerations in Ethical Decision-Making and Software Piracy. Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):161 - 167.
Denise M. Patterson (2001). Causal Effects of Regulatory, Organizational and Personal Factors on Ethical Sensitivity. Journal of Business Ethics 30 (2):123 - 159.
Thomas Richardron, Fast Recalculation of the Covariance Matrix Implied by a Recursive Structural Equation Model.
Philip T. Smith, Frank McKenna, Claire Pattison & Andrea Waylen (2001). Structural Equation Modelling of Human Judgement. Thinking and Reasoning 7 (1):51 – 68.
Göran Svensson, Greg Wood, Jang Singh, Janice M. Payan & Michael Callaghan (2011). The Embeddedness of Codes of Ethics in Organizations in Australia, Canada and the United States. Business Ethics 20 (4):405-417.
Peter Spirtes, Thomas Richardson, Chris Meek & Richard Scheines, Using Path Diagrams as a Structural Equation Modelling Tool.
G. Isaac Robert, M. Herremans Irene & J. Kline Theresa (2010). Intellectual Capital Management Enablers: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 93 (3).
Kelly D. Martin & John B. Cullen (2009). Appreciating the Meta-Analytic Methodological Context: Rejoinder to a Reply. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):763 - 766.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #23,836 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?