Arendt and Nietzsche on responsibility and futurity
Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (6):617-642 (2008)
| Abstract | This article compares Nietzsche's and Arendt's critiques of the juridical concept of responsibility (that emphasizes duty and blame) with the aim of deriving an account of responsibility appropriate for our time. It examines shared ground in their radical approaches to responsibility: by basing personal responsibility in conscience that expresses a self open to an undetermined future, rather than conscience determined by prevailing moral norms, they make a connection between a failure of personal responsibility and the way a totalizing politics jeopardizes human plurality. Two differences between Arendt and Nietzsche are also explored: Nietzsche's account of the corporeal and affective dimensions of conscience explains how politics can foreclose the futural, undetermined dimension of conscience; Arendt's account of political community exposes the mutual dependence of personal and political responsibility. By drawing together these aspects of Arendt's and Nietzsche's thought, the article aims to show how a failure of political responsibility can precipitate a failure of personal responsibility by undermining the basis of normativity that both liberal democratic politics and individual moral conscience would ordinarily share. Key Words: Hannah Arendt • conscience • futurity • Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche • normativity • responsibility • somatic reflexivity • totalitarianism. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesIrving Louis Horowitz (2012). Hannah Arendt: Radical Conservative. Transaction Publishers.
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (2007). On the Genealogy of Morality. Cambridge University Press.
Alice MacLachlan, An Ethic of Plurality: Reconciling Politics and Morality in Hannah Arendt. History and Judgment: IWM JVF Conference Vol. 21.
Mick Smith (2006). Environmental Risks and Ethical Responsibilities: Arendt, Beck, and the Politics of Acting Into Nature. Environmental Ethics 28 (3):227-246.
Arne Johan Vetlesen (2001). Hannah Arendt on Conscience and Evil. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (5):1-33.
Garrath Williams (1998). Love and Responsibility: A Political Ethic for Hannah Arendt. Political Studies 46 (5):937-950.
Donovan Miyasaki (2010). Nietzsche Contra Freud on Bad Conscience. Nietzsche-Studien 39.
Gabriel Zamosc (2011). The Relation Between Sovereignty and Guilt in Nietzsche's Genealogy. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):n/a-n/a.
Hannah Arendt (2003). Responsibility and Judgment. Schocken Books.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads82 ( #9,284 of 549,128 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,128 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
