David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Few philosophers today know much about Charles Peirce’s metaphysics, although a great many know something about his epistemology, philosophy of science, and logic. Indeed, few Peirce experts have written much on his metaphysics or made it the focus of their research. To an extent, this is understandable. Peirce’s writings were left in a disastrously disorganized state (mostly unpublished), and the crucial papers on metaphysics from his later years have not yet been republished in the first-rate chronological edition, the incomplete Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition , edited at Indianapolis by my friends. And then there is Peirce’s writing: an awkward, abrasive, arrogant, eclectic style that demands technical knowledge in diverse fields, especially logic, mathematics, and the natural sciences. His worst personality traits manifested themselves in his highly technical metaphysics—with its idiosyncratic, anti-Cantorian conception of continua, a pecularly mathematical phenomenology, and elaborate views on Darwinian and non-Darwinian evolution, for example. Finally, there is what might appear to be the bizarreness of the theory itself, as we shall see. Peirce was a kind of philosophical swashbuckler, a bold, courageous speculator on philosophical questions beyond most of our temperaments even to ponder. Ours is not the philosophical age of Errol Flynn but the minimalist age of Harrison Ford, with no grand gestures or speeches, just a series of small, no-nonsense gestures: we typically like our philosophy short, neat, "science-like," and isolated from other philosophical issues
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Forster (1997). Kant, Boole and Peirce's Early Metaphysics. Synthese 113 (1):43-70.
Christopher Hookway (2010). Review of Charles Sanders Peirce, Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 8: 1890-1892. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (8).
Andrew Reynolds (2002). Peirce's Scientific Metaphysics: The Philosophy of Chance, Law, and Evolution. Vanderbilt University Press.
Robert F. Almeder (1984). Review: The Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Vol. I 1857-1866. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (4):494-497.
Thomas A. Goudge (1986). Review: Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 2, 1867-1871. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1):132-134.
Kelly A. Parker (1998). The Continuity of Peirce's Thought. Vanderbilt University Press.
Douglas Anderson (2011). The Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition: 1890–1892. The Pluralist 6 (2):61-64.
Kelly A. Parker (2011). Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 8: 1890–1892 Edited by the Peirce Edition Project, Nathan Houser, General Editor. [REVIEW] Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (3):348-352.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-07-31
Total downloads4 ( #267,800 of 1,101,947 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?