David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
We argue that Nash’s solution to the bargaining problem should be modified such that it will be based on a New Reference Point (NRP). Such a point is needed so that a player is not considered ‘individually rational’ if he accepts an agreement that provides him with a utility lower than the minimal utility he can derive from any Pareto optimal agreement, or if he accepts an agreement that provides him a utility lower than the one he can obtain by unilateral action. The employment of such NRP requires modifying two axioms and hence leads to a new proposed solution.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Joachim Rosenmüller (1997). Bargaining with Incomplete Information an Axiomatic Approach. Theory and Decision 42 (2):105-146.
Edward McClennen (2012). Rational Cooperation. Synthese 187 (1):65-93.
Vincent J. Vannetelbosch (1999). Alternating-Offer Bargaining and Common Knowledge of Rationality. Theory and Decision 47 (2):111-138.
Vincenzo Denicolò & Marco Mariotti (2000). Nash Bargaining Theory, Nonconvex Problems and Social Welfare Orderings. Theory and Decision 48 (4):351-358.
Paul Weirich (1991). Contractiarianism and Bargaining Theory. Journal of Philosophical Research 16:369-385.
Michael Byron (1995). Rationality Is Not Fair. Analysis 55 (4):252 - 260.
Michael Moehler (2010). The (Stabilized) Nash Bargaining Solution as a Principle of Distributive Justice. Utilitas 22 (4):447-473.
Jonathan Shalev (2002). Loss Aversion and Bargaining. Theory and Decision 52 (3):201-232.
Andreas Pfingsten & Andreas Wagener (2003). Bargaining Solutions as Social Compromises. Theory and Decision 55 (4):359-389.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-07-25
Total downloads1 ( #454,238 of 1,100,145 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #304,144 of 1,100,145 )
How can I increase my downloads?