Michael Polanyi's Epistemology Of Science And Its Implications For A Problem In Moral Philosophy

Tradition and Discovery 29 (1):49-59 (2002)
Abstract
Ethical particularists allege that there are, on account of epistemological limitations, no such things as general moral principles. This paper defends the existence of general moral principles by adapting and appropriating Polanyi’s epistemology of science to this problem in moral philosophy
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    D. M. Yeager (2002). Confronting the Minotaur. Tradition and Discovery 29 (1):22-48.
    Garrett Cullity (2006). As You Were? Philosophical Explorations 9 (1):117 – 132.
    Rebecca Lynn Stangl (2006). Particularism and the Point of Moral Principles. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):201 - 229.
    John Polanyi (2004). Michael Polanyi, The Scientist. Tradition and Discovery 31 (1):7-10.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-03-18

    Total downloads

    2 ( #258,237 of 1,088,810 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,810 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.