Who's afraid of Nagelian reduction?

Erkenntnis 73 (3):393-412 (2010)
Abstract
We reconsider the Nagelian theory of reduction and argue that, contrary to a widely held view, it is the right analysis of intertheoretic reduction, since the alleged difficulties of the theory either vanish upon closer inspection or turn out to be substantive philosophical questions rather than knock-down arguments.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,101
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Craig Callender (2001). Taking Thermodynamics Too Seriously. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (4):539-553.

View all 32 references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations

Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-05-01

Total downloads

82 ( #17,657 of 1,102,106 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #34,151 of 1,102,106 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.