Philosophical Studies 112 (1):69-91 (2003)
|Abstract||In this paper we consider, and reject, Harold Langsams defenceof the Theory of Appearing, in this journal (1997), in the faceof three standard arguments against it. These arguments are:the argument from hallucination; the argument from the samecause-same effect principle; and the argument from perceptualtime-gap.|
|Keywords||Appearing Cause Experience Hallucination Metaphysics Perception Langsam, H|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Elizabeth H. Wolgast (1960). The Experience in Perception. Philosophical Review 69 (April):165-182.
Brad J. Thompson (2010). The Spatial Content of Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):146-184.
Harold Langsam (1995). Why Pains Are Mental Objects. Journal of Philosophy 92 (6):303-13.
R. M. Yost (1964). Price on Appearing and Appearances. Journal of Philosophy 61 (May):328-333.
Joseph Levine (2006). Color and Color Experience: Colors as Ways of Appearing. Dialectica 60 (3):269-282.
Alan H. Goldman (1976). Appearing as Irreducible in Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (December):147-164.
Alex Byrne (2001). Do Colors Look Like Dispositions? Reply to Langsam and Others. Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203):238-245.
Harold Langsam (2006). Why I Believe in an External World. Metaphilosophy 37 (5):652-672.
H. H. Price (1964). Appearing and Appearances. American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (January):3-19.
Harold Langsam (1997). The Theory of Appearing Defended. Philosophical Studies 87 (1):33-59.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #32,626 of 722,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #10,259 of 722,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?