Review: Bare Facts and Naked Truths: A New Correspondence Theory of Truth
Mind 116 (463):746-749 (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesD. Goldstick (1975). Correspondence. Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (2):195-197.
James O. Young (2009). Truth, Correspondence and Deflationism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):563-575.
David Holdcroft (1981). Bradley and the Impossibility of Absolute Truth. History and Philosophy of Logic 2 (1-2):25-39.
Susan Haack (1976). Is It True What They Say About Tarski? Philosophy 51 (197):323-.
Andrew Newman (2002). The Correspondence Theory of Truth: An Essay on the Metaphysics of Predication. Cambridge University Press.
Julian Dodd (2000). An Identity Theory of Truth. St. Martin's Press.
D. M. Armstrong (2004). Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge University Press.
G. Englebretsen (2006). Bare Facts and Truth: An Essay on the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Ashgate Publishing Company.
Hugo Meynell (2009). Bare Facts and Naked Truths: A New Correspondence Theory of Truth. By George Englebretsen. Heythrop Journal 50 (3):524-525.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads12 ( #93,336 of 549,067 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,067 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
