David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):198-201 (2002)
In this issue of the journal Mark Brown has offered a new argument against my potential future of value theory. I argue that even though the premises of this new argument are far more defensible than the premises of his old argument, the new argument does not show that the potential future of value theory of the wrongness of killing is false. If the considerations to which Brown appeals are used, not to show that the potential future of value theory is false, but to show that abortion is morally permissible, they are also unsuccessful. I also argue that Brown's clarified self-represented future of value account and Simon Parsons's account of the wrongness of killing are both subject to major difficulties. Finally, I show, in an appendix, that Brown's assertion that my discussion of his views suffers from major logical errors is false
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
M. Brown (2002). Abortion and the Value of the Future. A Reply To: A Defence of the Potential Future of Value Theory. Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):202-202.
Daniel Innerarity (2012). The Future and its Enemies: In Defense of Political Hope. Stanford University Press.
Ezio Di Nucci (2009). On How to Interpret the Role of the Future Within the Abortion Debate. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (10):651-652.
Joseph Diekemper (2005). Presentism and Ontological Symmetry. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (2):223 – 240.
Michael D. Robinson (2004). Divine Guidance and an Accidentally Necessary Future: A Response to Hunt. Religious Studies 40 (4):493-498.
Rob Lovering (2009). Futures of Value and the Destruction of Human Embryos. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (3):pp. 463-488.
Charles Tedder (2010). The Liberal Arts and Commensurability. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):80-92.
Zhang Longxi (2011). The Humanities: Their Value, Defence, Crisis, and Future. Diogenes 58 (1-2):64-74.
Sven Rosenkranz (2012). In Defence of Ockhamism. Philosophia 40 (3):617-631.
Stephen H. Fuller (1982). Becoming the Organization of the Future. Journal of Business Ethics 1 (2):115 - 118.
C. Strong (2009). Reply to Di Nucci: Why the Counterexamples Succeed. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):326-327.
John E. Stewart (2007). The Future Evolution of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (8):58-92.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads2 ( #354,961 of 1,102,938 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,435 of 1,102,938 )
How can I increase my downloads?