David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 36 (1-2):165-185 (2002)
The author critiques the expedient application of market valuation principles by the transnational corporations and other large firms in the Indian pharmaceutical industry on a number of issues like patents, pricing, irrational drugs, clinical trials, etc. He contends that ethics in business is chiseled and etched within the confines of particular social structures of accumulation. An ascendant neo-liberal social structure of accumulation has basically shaped these firms' sharp opposition to the Indian Patents Act, 1970, government administered pricing, etc. The author contends that the practice of neo-liberal economics is strongly associated with a "one dimensional" ethics that privileges market valuation principles over all others. This seems to inevitably generate a social counter-movement that struggles for social protections. He critiques neo-liberal business practices from a perspective that derives from the work of the economic anthropologist Karl Polanyi. Before the present phase of liberalization in India, markets were "managed", but without a "welfare state" in place. Moving toward deregulation of the markets without a welfare state in place is unethical. Keeping the debilities of the institutional framework of public policy in mind, the author adopts a Polanyian perspective that places its trust and hope in the growing social legitimacy of the counter-movement in opposition to both neo-liberal business practices and the degenerate behavior of state agencies
|Keywords||Asocial democracy counter-movement liberalism neo-liberal business ethics neo-liberalism patents social democracy social structure of accumulation transnational corporations|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Symphorien Ntibagirirwa (2009). Cultural Values, Economic Growth and Development. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (3):297 - 311.
Deborah L. Gunthorpe (1997). Business Ethics: A Quantitative Analysis of the Impact of Unethical Behavior by Publicly Traded Corporations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (5):537-543.
Julia Resnik (2009). Multicultural Education - Good for Business but Not for the State? The IB Curriculum and Global Capitalism. British Journal of Educational Studies 57 (3):217 - 244.
Andrew Barry, Thomas Osborne & Nikolas S. Rose (eds.) (1996). Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism, and Rationalities of Government. University of Chicago Press.
Kenneth Amaeshi & Olufemi O. Amao (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility in Transnational Speces: Exploring Influences of Varieties of Capitalism on Expressions of Corporate Codes of Conduct in Nigeria. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 86 (2):225 - 239.
Robert Hassan (2008). Network Speed and Democratic Politics. World Futures 64 (1):3 – 21.
Nicola Berg & Dirk Holtbrügge (2001). Public Affairs Management Activities of German Multinational Corporations in India. Journal of Business Ethics 30 (1):105-119.
Barry Hindess (2000). Democracy and the Neo‐Liberal Promotion of Arbitrary Power. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (4):68-84.
Raymond Plant (2009). The Neo-Liberal State. OUP Oxford.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #243,578 of 1,940,952 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,800 of 1,940,952 )
How can I increase my downloads?