Book Review: What Makes Us Think?: A Neuroscientist and a Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain
Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (1):115-118 (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesP. Janich (2003). Human Nature and Neurosciences: A Methodical Cultural Criticism of Naturalism in the Neurosciences. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (1):29-40.
Allen Buchanan (2009). Human Nature and Enhancement. Bioethics 23 (3):141-150.
Pierre Jacob & Marc Jeannerod (2003). Ways of Seeing: The Scope and Limits of Visual Cognition. OUP Oxford.
Paul Gyllenhammer (2003). Changeux, Jean-Pierre, and Paul Ricoeur. What Makes Us Think? A Neuroscientist and a Philosopher Argue About Ethics, Human Nature and the Brain. The Review of Metaphysics 56 (4):867-868.
Robert H. Blank (2002). Review of Jean-Pierre Changeux and Paul Ricoeur. 2000.What Makes Us Think? A Neuroscientist and Philosopher Argue About Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain. [REVIEW] American Journal of Bioethics 2 (4):69-70.
Kenneth Williford (2005). What Makes Us Think?: A Neuroscientist and a Philosopher Argue About Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain. Minds and Machines 15 (1):91-97.
Cheryl L. Hughes (1998). The Primacy of Ethics: Hobbes and Levinas. Continental Philosophy Review 31 (1):79-94.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads9 ( #114,013 of 549,067 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,067 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
