Under the Banner of the new science: History, science, and the problem of particularity in early twentieth-century japan
Philosophy East and West 48 (2):232-256 (1998)
|Abstract||The notion that particularism is a feature of traditional Japanese thought is argued against, demonstrating that leading Continental philosophies advocated "particularity" in Japanese interwar social and political theory as the most modern development in Western thought. This theory of modern particularity was explored in the Japanese journal Under the Banner of the New Science in the late 1920s, leading to subsequent development in both Marxist and non-Marxist social theories in Japan|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
A. Richardson (2003). The Geometry of Knowledge: Lewis, Becker, Carnap and the Formalization of Philosophy in the 1920s. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):165-182.
Sandra M. Den Otter (1996). British Idealism, and Social Explanation: A Study in Late Victorian Thought. Oxford University Press.
Corneliu C. Simut (2010). Traditionalism and Radicalism in the History of Christian Thought. Palgrave Macmillan.
Stuart Shanker (ed.) (1996). Philosophy of Science, Logic, and Mathematics in the Twentieth Century. Routledge.
Harold Dorn (2000). Science, Marx, and History: Are There Still Research Frontiers? Perspectives on Science 8 (3):223-254.
P. J. Markie (2009). Political Obligation and the Particularity Problem. Ratio 22 (3):322-337.
Osamu Sakura (1998). Similarities and Varieties: A Brief Sketch on the Reception of Darwinism and Sociobiology in Japan. Biology and Philosophy 13 (3).
Richard M. Reitan (2010). Making a Moral Society: Ethics and the State in Meiji Japan. University of Hawaii Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #201,695 of 548,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?