Consistency in the Armed Enforcement of Human Rights: A Moral Necessity?

Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (1):92-109 (2011)
Abstract There is no denying that international human rights norms are enforced selectively. Some oppressive governments become the targets of military intervention, while the political sovereignty of other, equally oppressive regimes is left intact. My aim in this paper is to determine whether a military operation to defend human rights can possibly be made morally illegitimate by the fact that the state prosecuting it has failed, is failing or will fail to defend human rights under relevantly similar circumstances elsewhere
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,679
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    João Cardoso Rosas (2008). Human Rights. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 11:93-100.
    Joseph Raz (2010). Human Rights Without Foundations. In J. Tasioulas & S. Besson (eds.), The Philosphy of International Law. Oxford University Press.
    Patrick Hayden (1999). Sentimentality and Human Rights. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 6 (3/4):59-66.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-03-06

    Total downloads

    29 ( #42,388 of 549,071 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,317 of 549,071 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums