David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (2):151-172 (2009)
In this article the implications of our nature as both autonomous and heteronomous beings is discussed. It is suggested that our condition as part-dependent creatures calls for a reconsideration of the nature of both freedom and liberalism, and the work of Alasdair MacIntyre and Jean-Paul Sartre is used to illustrate the natural and historical dimensions of our dependency. The conclusion reached is that neither deep ecological re-enchantment nor full-blooded cornucopianism are possible, and that we need to take our nature as semi-dependent creatures seriously as we seek ways of negotiating our way through our environmental problems
|Keywords||freedom dependency autonomy heteronomy Kant MacIntyre Sartre dialectic liberalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Raymond M. Herbenick (1989). Natural Fetal Dependency States and Fetal Dependency Principles. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 63:173-181.
Rory Spowers (2002). Rising Tides: A History of the Environmental Revolution and Visions for an Ecological Age. Canongate.
Paul Smeyers (2012). Chains of Dependency: On the Disenchantment and the Illusion of Being Free at Last (Part 1). Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (2):177-191.
Andrew W. Cecil (1987). The Unchanging Spirit of Freedom. In Hans Mark & W. Lawson Taitte (eds.), Traditional Moral Values in the Age of Technology. Distributed by the University of Texas Press.
Andrew McLaughlin (1987). The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Environmental Ethics 9 (4):377-380.
Jim Gerrie (2008). Three Species of Technological Dependency. Techné 12 (3):184-194.
Asha Bhandary (2010). Dependency in Justice: Can Rawlsian Liberalism Accommodate Kittay's Dependency Critique? Hypatia 25 (1):140-156.
Eva Kittay (2002). Love's Labor Revisited. Hypatia 17 (3):237 - 250.
Added to index2009-06-25
Total downloads15 ( #90,381 of 1,089,057 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?