David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in East European Thought 63 (2):159-171 (2011)
This article discusses the role of representative strategies in twentieth-century Russian culture. Just as Russia interacted with Europe in the Marquis de Custine’s time via discourse and representation, in the twentieth century Russia re-entered European consciousness by simulating ‘socialism’. In the post-Soviet era, the nation aspired to be admitted to the ‘European house’ by simulating a ‘market economy’, ‘democracy’, and ‘postmodernism’. But in reality Russia remains the same country as before, torn between the reality of its own helplessness and poverty, and the messianic myth of its own greatness. Post-Soviet culture is a product of Stalinist culture. ‘Russian postmodernism’ was created less by artists, writers, poets, and film makers, than by theorists and critics. At the beginning of the 1990s, a need to describe contemporary Russian culture emerged. In this way, ‘Russian postmodernism’ arose from the desire to ‘sell’ projects in the West—from the simple obligation to describe socialist experience in concrete, transferable terms that Westerners could grasp. The nostalgia experienced by the post-Soviet era creates its own simulated postmodernism , in which the matrices of the construction and functioning of culture cease to be connected with specifically Russian (Soviet) history, and instead reproduce Western models almost exactly. We are facing yet another attempt at radical cultural modernization. If the first attempt (revolutionary culture) was the most original and fruitful, and the second (Stalinist culture, Socialist Realism) was less productive but still original, then the third, post-Soviet, attempt (rich in individuality, but lacking in original ideas or style) is for the moment the least productive and original. If we exclude sots-art (conceptualism) from ‘Russian postmodernism’, there would be nothing left. Clearly, an original cultural model in post-Soviet Russia will not take shape until original strategies for processing the country’s cultural past are developed. In their turn, these strategies can only result from a radical transformation of post-Soviet identity into a new, genuinely Russian one
|Keywords||Soviet culture Post-Soviet culture Stalinism Socialist realism Russian postmodernism Sots-art Conceptualism Representation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Evgeny Dobrenko (2011). Erratum To: Utopias of Return: Notes on (Post-)Soviet Culture and its Frustrated (Post-)Modernization. Studies in East European Thought 63 (2):173-173.
Edward M. Swiderski (1998). Culture, Contexts, and Directions in Russian Post-Soviet Philosophy. Studies in East European Thought 50 (4):283-328.
Evert Van Der Zweerde (2001). The Normalization of the History of Philosophy in Post-Soviet Russian Philosophical Culture. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 12:95-104.
James P. Scanlan (2001). Main Currents of Post-Soviet Philosophy in Russia. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:121-129.
Dmitry Shlapentokh (2007). Dugin Eurasianism: A Window on the Minds of the Russian Elite or an Intellectual Ploy? Studies in East European Thought 59 (3):215 - 236.
Skaidra Trilupaityte (2007). Totalitarianism and the Problem of Soviet Art Evaluation: The Lithuanian Case. Studies in East European Thought 59 (4):261 - 280.
Evert van der Zweerde (2001). The Normalization of the History of Philosophy in Post-Soviet Russian Philosophical Culture. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:95-104.
David M. Kotz (2001). Is Russia Becoming Capitalist? Science and Society 65 (2):157 - 181.
Natalia Avtonomova (2001). On the (Re)Creation of Russian Philosophical Language. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:83-94.
Almira Ousmanova (2003). On the Ruins of Orthodox Marxism: Gender and Cultural Studies in Eastern Europe. Studies in East European Thought 55 (1):37-50.
Christopher J. Rees & Galina Miazhevich (2009). Socio-Cultural Change and Business Ethics in Post-Soviet Countries: The Cases of Belarus and Estonia. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 86 (1):51 - 63.
Douglas Rogers (2009). The Old Faith and the Russian Land: A Historical Ethnography of Ethics in the Urals. Cornell University Press.
Bernard Jeu (1973). A Note on Some Armenian Philosophers. Studies in East European Thought 13 (3-4):251-264.
Boris Dubin (2003). The Younger Generation of Culture Scholars and Culture-Studies in Russia Today. Studies in East European Thought 55 (1):27-36.
Anna Temkina & Elena Zdravomyslova (2003). Gender Studies in Post-Soviet Society: Western Frames and Cultural Differences. Studies in East European Thought 55 (1):51-61.
Added to index2011-07-21
Total downloads14 ( #240,257 of 1,790,225 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #427,637 of 1,790,225 )
How can I increase my downloads?