Utopias of return: notes on (post-)Soviet culture and its frustrated (post-)modernisation

Studies in East European Thought 63 (2):159-171 (2011)
This article discusses the role of representative strategies in twentieth-century Russian culture. Just as Russia interacted with Europe in the Marquis de Custine’s time via discourse and representation, in the twentieth century Russia re-entered European consciousness by simulating ‘socialism’. In the post-Soviet era, the nation aspired to be admitted to the ‘European house’ by simulating a ‘market economy’, ‘democracy’, and ‘postmodernism’. But in reality Russia remains the same country as before, torn between the reality of its own helplessness and poverty, and the messianic myth of its own greatness. Post-Soviet culture is a product of Stalinist culture. ‘Russian postmodernism’ was created less by artists, writers, poets, and film makers, than by theorists and critics. At the beginning of the 1990s, a need to describe contemporary Russian culture emerged. In this way, ‘Russian postmodernism’ arose from the desire to ‘sell’ projects in the West—from the simple obligation to describe socialist experience in concrete, transferable terms that Westerners could grasp. The nostalgia experienced by the post-Soviet era creates its own simulated postmodernism , in which the matrices of the construction and functioning of culture cease to be connected with specifically Russian (Soviet) history, and instead reproduce Western models almost exactly. We are facing yet another attempt at radical cultural modernization. If the first attempt (revolutionary culture) was the most original and fruitful, and the second (Stalinist culture, Socialist Realism) was less productive but still original, then the third, post-Soviet, attempt (rich in individuality, but lacking in original ideas or style) is for the moment the least productive and original. If we exclude sots-art (conceptualism) from ‘Russian postmodernism’, there would be nothing left. Clearly, an original cultural model in post-Soviet Russia will not take shape until original strategies for processing the country’s cultural past are developed. In their turn, these strategies can only result from a radical transformation of post-Soviet identity into a new, genuinely Russian one
Keywords Soviet culture  Post-Soviet culture  Stalinism  Socialist realism  Russian postmodernism  Sots-art  Conceptualism  Representation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11212-011-9142-2
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,280
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
James P. Scanlan (2001). Main Currents of Post-Soviet Philosophy in Russia. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:121-129.
David M. Kotz (2001). Is Russia Becoming Capitalist? Science and Society 65 (2):157 - 181.
Natalia Avtonomova (2001). On the (Re)Creation of Russian Philosophical Language. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:83-94.
Bernard Jeu (1973). A Note on Some Armenian Philosophers. Studies in East European Thought 13 (3-4):251-264.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

24 ( #196,699 of 1,932,455 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #94,262 of 1,932,455 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.