An interpretation of the st. Louis philosophical movement
Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 6 (13):337-345 (1909)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesVincent Colapietro (2003). Bebop as Historical Actuality, Urban Aesthetic, and Critical Utterance. Philosophy and Geography 6 (2):153 – 165.
Louis Arnaud Reid (1980). Human Movement, the Aesthetic and Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 20 (2):165-170.
Alwin Nikolais (2005). The Nikolais/Louis Dance Technique: A Philosophy and Method of Modern Dance. Routledge.
Charles M. Perry (1936). William Torrey Harris and the St. Louis Movement in Philosophy. The Monist 46 (1):59-79.
Tom Burke (2011). Empiricism, Pragmatism, and the Settlement Movement. The Pluralist 5 (3).
J. H. R. (1931). The St. Louis Movement in Philosophy. The New Scholasticism 5 (3):285-285.
H. R. J. (1931). The St. Louis Movement in Philosophy. The New Scholasticism 5 (3).
Louis Dupré (1991). An Interpretation of Religion. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 65 (1):109-111.
Richard Field, St. Louis Hegelians. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Charles Milton Perry (1930). The St. Louis Movement in Philosophy. Norman, University of Oklahoma Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
