David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 22 (3-4):129- (1928)
The last phase of Greek philosophy has until recently been less intelligently studied than any other, and in our understanding of its development there are still lamentable lacunae. Three errors in particular have in the past prevented a proper appreciation of Plotinus' place in the history of philosophy. The first was the failure to distinguish Neoplatonism from Platonism: this vitiates the work of many early exponents from Ficinus down to Kirchner. The second was the belief that the Neoplatonists, being ‘mystics,’ were necessarily incomprehensible to the plain man or even to the plain philosopher. To have encouraged the persistence of this superstition in the nineteenth century is the least pardonable of Creuzer's many sins. The third was the chronological confusion involved in the ascription to Saint Paul's contemporary of the works of the pretended Dionysius Areopagita, which contain a fully-developed Neoplatonic theology. Though the fraud had been exposed by Scaliger, these writings continued down to the beginning of the nineteenth century to be used as evidence that the ‘Nsoplatonic trinity’ was an inferior imitation of the Christian one. When this false trail was at length abandoned the fashion for orientalizing explanations persisted in another guise: to the earliest historians of Neoplatonism, Simon and Vacherot, the school of Plotinus was ‘the school of Alexandria,’ and its inspiration was mainly Egyptian. Vacherot says of Neoplatonism that it is ‘essentially and radically oriental, having nothing of Greek thought but its language and procedure.’ Few would be found to-day to subscribe to so sweeping a pronouncement; but the existence of an important oriental element in Plotinus' thought is still affirmed by many French and German writers
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mary Louise Gill (2014). Design of the Exercise in Plato’s Parmenides. Dialogue 53 (3):495-520.
Mathieu Marion (2014). Les Arguments de Zénon D’Après le Parménide de Platon. Dialogue 53 (3):393-434.
Similar books and articles
J. Tate (1941). Plato and Parmenides Francis Macdonald Cornford: Plato and Parmenides. Parmenides' Way of Truth and Plato's Parmenides Translated with an Introduction and a Running Commentary. Pp. Xvii+251. London: Kegan Paul, 1939. Cloth, 12s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (02):76-78.
J. A. Towey (1988). Plato's Parmenides. [REVIEW] American Journal of Philology 109:600-602.
Egil A. Wylter (1963). Two Recent Interpretations of Plato's Parmenides. Inquiry 6 (1-4):200 – 211.
Dylan M. Burns (2011). John D. Turner and Kevin Corrigan, Eds. Plato's Parmenides and Its Heritage, Vol. 2. Reception in Patristic, Gnostic, and Christian Neoplatonic Texts. [REVIEW] Augustinian Studies 42 (2):295-301.
Samuel Charles Rickless (2007). Plato's Forms in Transition: A Reading of the Parmenides. Cambridge University Press.
John Anderson Palmer (1999). Plato's Reception of Parmenides. Oxford University Press.
Patricia Curd (2000). PLATO'S PARMENIDES J. A. Palmer: Plato's Reception of Parmenides . Pp. Xiii + 294. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999. Cased, £45/$65. ISBN: 0-19-823800-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (02):488-.
John E. Sisko (2010). Anaxagoras Betwixt Parmenides and Plato. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):432-442.
Jenny Bryan (2012). Likeness and Likelihood in the Presocratics and Plato. Cambridge University Press.
Catherine H. Zuckert (2009). Plato's Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues. The University of Chicago Press.
A. H. Coxon (1999). The Philosophy of Forms: An Analytical and Historical Commentary on Plato's Parmenides: With a New English Translation. Van Gorcum.
Henry Teloh (1976). Parmenides and Plato's Parmenides 131a-132c. Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (2):125-130.
Frank A. Lewis (1979). Parmenides on Separation and the Knowability of the Forms: Plato Parmenides 133a Ff. Philosophical Studies 35 (2):105 - 127.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads89 ( #31,851 of 1,725,584 )
Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #44,339 of 1,725,584 )
How can I increase my downloads?