Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):97-111 (2006)
|Abstract||The original definition of a technical term, the paper argues, should not be altered without a good reason. This notion is applied to the conception of illocutionary acts suggested by Alston, which markedly differs from the conception originally introduced by John L. Austin. Alston appears to agree with the argument; at least, he does attempt to justify his re-definition. The paper argues, however, that the reasons he gives fail.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
William Hasker (2010). Alston on the Rationality of Doxastic Practices. Faith and Philosophy 27 (2):205-211.
John Turri (2008). Practical and Epistemic Justification in Alston's Perceiving God. Faith and Philosophy 25 (3):290 - 299.
Klaus Petrus (2006). Illokution Und Konvention, Oder Auch: Was Steckt Nun Wirklich Hinter Austins ,,Securing of Uptake"? Grazer Philosophische Studien 70 (1):101-126.
Tomoyuki Yamada (2008). Logical Dynamics of Some Speech Acts That Affect Obligations and Preferences. Synthese 165 (2):295 - 315.
Mark Siebel (2003). Illocutionary Acts and Attitude Expression. Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (3):351-366.
Mark Siebel (2001). William P. Alston: Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning, Cornell University Press: Ithaca and London 2000. Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):249-261.
Robert M. Harnish (2002). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning William P. Alston Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000, Xiii + 327 Pp., $48.50. [REVIEW] Dialogue 41 (03):589-.
M. Kissine (2009). Illocutionary Forces and What is Said. Mind and Language 24 (1):122-138.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #60,181 of 722,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?