David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 20 (1):1-34 (2012)
Abstract This article traces a historical shift, and in particular its erasure from memory on the intellectual map of the West, in concepts of subjectivity across practices of rabbinic thinking in late antiquity, medieval interpretations of the Talmud, and modern talmudic scholarship. I first introduce a comparative perspective that relies on a mutual hermeneutics of philosophical and talmudic traditions. I consequently engage with Alain de Libera's archaeological analysis of the birth of the thinking subject in medieval philosophy and theology. In this light, I analyze the role of the notion of the thinking subject in construing the Talmud from Maimonides to contemporary Talmud criticism. Finally, I explore the implications of de Libera's program of a philosophical archaeology of the thinking subject for mapping the complex relationship of mutual presupposition and exclusion between philosophical, rhetorical, and talmudic traditions of thinking in antiquity, as manifested in the larger scope of these traditions
|Keywords||Subjectivity philosophical archaeology Talmud thinking|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hyam Maccoby (2002). The Philosophy of the Talmud. Routledgecurzon.
Robert H. Carver (2004). If the River Stopped: A Talmudic Perspective on Downsizing. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 50 (2):137-147.
Jacob Howland (2011). Plato and the Talmud. Cambridge University Press.
Joshua Fogel & Hershey H. Friedman (2008). Conflict of Interest and the Talmud. Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):237 - 246.
M. Abraham, Dov M. Gabbay & U. Schild (2009). Analysis of the Talmudic Argumentum a Fortiori Inference Rule (Kal Vachomer) Using Matrix Abduction. Studia Logica 92 (3):281 - 364.
Dov M. Gabbay & Moshe Koppel (2011). Uncertainty Rules in Talmudic Reasoning. History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (1):63-69.
Howard Wettstein (1997). Doctrine. Faith and Philosophy 14 (4):423-443.
Hershey H. Friedman (1985). Ethical Behavior in Business: A Hierarchical Approach From the Talmud. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 4 (2):117 - 129.
Martin Kavka (2006). Is There a Warrant for Levinas's Talmudic Readings? Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 14 (1):153-173.
Curtis Franks (2011). The Realm of the Sacred, Wherein We May Not Draw an Inference From Something Which Itself Has Been Inferred: A Reading of Talmud Bavli Zevachim Folio 50. History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (1):69 - 86.
Jacob Neusner (1997). Jerusalem and Athens: The Congruity of Talmudic and Classical Philosophy. E.J. Brill.
Avi Sion (1995). Judaic Logic. Lulu.Com.
Chanoch Lampner (1981). Character Development Via the Torah, Talmud, and Their Commentaries: A Unique Approach to the Improvement of One's Values According to the Instructions of the Torah and the Talmud. C. Lampner.
Simcha Kling (1968). A Sense of Duty. [Washington, B'nai B'rith Adult Jewish Education.
Daniel Boyarin (2008). Dialectic and Divination in the Talmud. In Simon Goldhill (ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge University Press 217.
Added to index2012-04-17
Total downloads14 ( #255,754 of 1,906,986 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #345,104 of 1,906,986 )
How can I increase my downloads?