Animal Experimentation
Teaching Philosophy 15 (3):291-292 (1992)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks (1995). Util-Izing Animals. Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):13-25.
Nathan Nobis (2003). So Why Does Animal Experimentation Matter? Review of Ellen Frankel Paul and Jeffrey Paul, Eds. 2001. Why Animal Experimentation Matters: The Use of Animals in Medical Research. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):1 – 2.
C. R. W. Spedding (2000). Animal Welfare. Earthscan Publications.
Andrew Knight (2011). The Costs and Benefits of Animal Experiments. Palgrave Macmillan.
Shasta Gaughen (ed.) (2005). Animal Rights. Greenhaven Press.
Joel Marks (2012). Accept No Substitutes: The Ethics of Alternatives. Hastings Center Report 42:S16-S18.
Nathan Nobis (2007). A Rational Defense of Animal Experimentation. Journal of Philosophical Research 32:49-62.
David Benatar (1999). Hugh LaFollette and Niall Shanks, Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation:Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation. Ethics 110 (1):207-211.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-12-02Total downloads1 ( #277,406 of 556,888 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
