Inclusive Ends, Dominant Ends, and Politics

Process Studies 40 (2):260-278 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I have argued elsewhere that the overall method that is required in liberal political philosophy is that of reflective equilibrium and that this method can be best understood in processual terms. In the present article I try to show how neoclassical (and other) theists can bring their convictions to bear in a politically liberal society, within the confines of this method, in a rational (rather than irrational or mad) manner.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Setting ends for oneself through reason.Andrews Reath - 2009 - In Simon Robertson (ed.), Spheres of Reason. Oxford University Press.
Ends.Mark LeBar - 2004 - Social Theory and Practice 30 (4):507-533.
The final ends of higher education in light of an african moral theory.Thaddeus Metz - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (2):179-201.
Caring, final ends and sports.William J. Morgan - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1):7 – 21.
Satisficing and optimality.Michael Byron - 1998 - Ethics 109 (1):67-93.
What rational choice explains.Robert E. Lane - 1995 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 9 (1-2):107-126.
Ethics and responsibility in politics.Gene Sharp - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):304 – 317.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
13 (#1,001,344)

6 months
1 (#1,520,257)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Dombrowski
Seattle University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references