David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Perspectives on Science 18 (4):409-431 (2010)
My goal in this paper is to develop our understanding of the role the imagination plays in Kant’s Critical account of geometry, and I do so by attending to how the imagination factors into the method of reasoning Kant assigns the geometer in the First Critique. Such an approach is not unto itself novel. Recent commentators, such as Friedman (1992) and Young (1992), have taken a careful look at the constructions of the productive imagination in pure intuition and highlighted the importance of the imagination’s activity for securing the universality of geometry knowledge. Specifically, as their respective examinations bring to light, it is only with due attention to the imagination that we can make sense of how a ..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Emily Carson (1999). Kant on the Method of Mathematics. Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (4):629-652.
Emily Carson (2002). Locke's Account of Certain and Instructive Knowledge. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (3):359 – 378.
Predrag Cicovacki (1990). Locke on Mathematical Knowledge. Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (4):511-524.
Mary Domski (2006). Construction Without Spatial Constraints: A Reply to Emily Carson. Locke Studies 6:85-99.
Mary Domski (2006). Construction Without Spatial Constraints: A Reply. Locke Studies 6:85-100.
Citations of this work BETA
Mary Domski (2013). Kant and Newton on the a Priori Necessity of Geometry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):438-447.
Similar books and articles
Ty D. Camp, From the Schematic to the Symbolic: The Radical Possibilities of the Imagination in Kant's Third Critique.
Michael Friedman (2012). Kant on Geometry and Spatial Intuition. Synthese 186 (1):231-255.
Sarah L. Gibbons (1994). Kant's Theory of Imagination: Bridging Gaps in Judgement and Experience. Oxford University Press.
Alexander M. Schlutz (2009). Mind's World: Imagination and Subjectivity From Descartes to Romanticism. University of Washington Press.
Rudolf A. Makkreel (1990). Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. University of Chicago Press.
Jennifer Church (2003). Depression, Depth, and the Imagination. In J. Philips & James Morley (eds.), Imagination and its Pathologies. MIT Press 335--360.
Gillian Robinson & John F. Rundell (eds.) (1994). Rethinking Imagination: Culture and Creativity. Routledge.
Emilia Angelova (2009). A Continuity Between the A and B Deductions of the Critique. Idealistic Studies 39 (1/3):53-69.
Mary Domski (2012). Newton and Proclus: Geometry, Imagination, and Knowing Space. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):389-413.
Markos Valaris (2008). Inner Sense, Self-Affection, and Temporal Consciousness in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Philosophers' Imprint 8 (4):1-18.
David Morris (2008). Reversibility and Ereignis: On Being as Kantian Imagination in Merleau-Ponty and Heidegger. Philosophy Today 52 (Supplement):135-143.
Eddie S. Glaude Jr (2011). On Prophecy and Critical Intelligence. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (2):105-121.
Michael J. Pendlebury (1996). The Role of Imagination in Perception. South African Journal of Philosophy 15 (4):133-138.
Added to index2010-10-03
Total downloads63 ( #37,193 of 1,699,674 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #88,892 of 1,699,674 )
How can I increase my downloads?