Nature as Personal

Philosophy and Theology 5 (1):81-96 (1990)
I first examine Origen’s notion of nature as personal, and secondly a modern presentation of the same theme by Erazim Kohak. I then consider possible scientific support given to both these authors’ accounts by Lovejoy. I conclude that there are many strengths in viewing nature as a whole as both divine and personal
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Michael Quante (2007). The Social Nature of Personal Identity. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (s 5-6):56-76.
    Martin Davies (2000). Persons and Their Underpinnings. Philosophical Explorations 3 (1):43-62.
    Desh Raj Sirswal (2008). Human Beings Have No Identical Self. Proceedings of the 20th Conference of All Orissa Philosophy Association (20):198-210.
    Michael S. Poulton (2009). Undergraduate Business Ethics Pedagogy. Journal of Business Ethics Education 6:93-102.
    Andrew Grosso (2008). Re-Visiting Personal Being. Tradition and Discovery 35 (1):48-49.

    Monthly downloads

    Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

    Added to index


    Total downloads


    Recent downloads (6 months)


    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.