Graduate studies at Western
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (1):25 - 37 (2007)
|Abstract||In this article I concentrate on three issues. First, Graham Oppy’s treatment of the relationship between the concept of infinity and Zeno’s paradoxes lay bare several porblems that must be dealt with if the concept of infinity is to do any intellectual work in philosophy of religion. Here I will expand on some insightful remarks by Oppy in an effort ot adequately respond to these problems. Second, I will do the same regarding Oppy’s treatment of Kant’s first antinomy in the first critique, which deals in part with the question of whether the world had a beginning in time or if time extends infinitely into the past. And third, my examination of these two issues will inform what I have to say regarding a key topic in philosophy of religion: the question regarding the proper relationship between the infinite and the finite in the concept of God.|
|Keywords||God Infinite Neoclassical theism Graham Oppy Charles Hartshorne|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Wolfgang Achtner (2011). Part I. Perspectives on Infinity From History : 1. Infinity as a Transformative Concept in Science and Theology. In Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.), Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge University Press.
Daniel A. Dombrowski (2006). Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. Cambridge University Press.
Wolfgang Achtner (2005). Infinity in Science and Religion. The Creative Role of Thinking About Infinity. Neue Zeitschrift Für Systematische Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 47 (4).
Graham Robert Oppy (2006). Arguing About Gods. Cambridge University Press.
Bruce Langtry (2011). Reply to Oppy on God, the Best and Evil. Sophia 50 (1):211-219.
Daniel Dombrowski (2010). Rival Concepts of God and Rival Versions of Mysticism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1-3):153-165.
Graham Robert Oppy (2006). Philosophical Perspectives on Infinity. Cambridge University Press.
Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.) (2011). Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge University Press.
Denys A. Turner (2011). A Partially Skeptical Response to Hart and Russell. [REVIEW] In Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.), Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #55,763 of 739,537 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,537 )
How can I increase my downloads?