David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (2006)
In recent years, the ontological argument and theistic metaphysics have been criticized by philosophers working in both the analytic and continental traditions. Responses to these criticisms have primarily come from philosophers who make use of the traditional, and problematic, concept of God. In this volume, Daniel A. Dombrowski defends the ontological argument against its contemporary critics, but he does so by using a neoclassical or process concept of God, thereby strengthening the case for a contemporary theistic metaphysics. Relying on the thought of Charles Hartshorne, he builds on Hartshorne's crucial distinction between divine existence and divine actuality, which enables neoclassical defenders of the ontological argument to avoid the familiar criticism that the argument moves illegitimately from an abstract concept to concrete reality. His argument, thus, avoids the problems inherent in the traditional concept of God as static.
|Keywords||Theism Process theology God Proof, Ontological|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$9.11 used (92% off) $29.19 new (72% off) $94.25 direct from Amazon (8% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BD555.D67 2006|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Daniel A. Dombrowski (2012). Homer, Competition, and Sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39 (1):33-51.
Similar books and articles
Robert D. Shofner (1974). Anselm Revisited: A Study on the Role of the Ontological Argument in the Writings of Karl Barth and Charles Hartshorne. Brill.
Chad A. McIntosh (2010). S5, God, and Numbers. Res Cogitans 1 (1):63-78.
Sandra Visser (2006). Review of Daniel A. Dombrowski, Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (12).
James Ross (2007). Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (1):147-150.
Yiftach J. H. Fehige (2009). Thought Experimenting with God. Revisiting the Ontological Argument. Neue Zeitschrift Für Systematische Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 51 (3):249-267.
Donald Wayne Viney (2007). Daniel A. Dombrowski, Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (3):171-172.
Elizabeth Burns (2009). Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. By Daniel A. Dombrowski. Heythrop Journal 50 (4):719-721.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads76 ( #18,344 of 1,102,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,777 of 1,102,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?