The constructible and the intelligible in Newton's philosophy of geometry

Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1114-1124 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the preface to the Principia (1687) Newton famously states that “geometry is founded on mechanical practice.” Several commentators have taken this and similar remarks as an indication that Newton was firmly situated in the constructivist tradition of geometry that was prevalent in the seventeenth century. By drawing on a selection of Newton's unpublished texts, I hope to show the faults of such an interpretation. In these texts, Newton not only rejects the constructivism that took its birth in Descartes's Géométrie (1637); he also presents the science of geometry as being more powerful than his Principia remarks may lead us to believe.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Newton’s Empiricism and Metaphysics.Mary Domski - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (7):525-534.
Force and Geometry in Newton's Principia. [REVIEW]Kenneth R. Westphal - 1998 - Review of Metaphysics 51 (4):923-925.
Geometry, Time and Force in the Diagrams of Descartes, Galileo, Torricelli and Newton.Emily R. Grosholz - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:237 - 248.
A dialogue with Descartes: Newton's ontology of true and immutable natures.J. E. McGuire - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (1):103-125.
The theology of Isaac Newton's principia mathematica : A preliminary survey.Stephen D. Snobelen - 2010 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 52 (4):377-412.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
96 (#164,486)

6 months
5 (#244,526)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mary Domski
University of New Mexico