Finitary and infinitary mathematics, the possibility of possibilities and the definition of probabilities
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Some relations between physics and finitary and infinitary mathematics are explored in the context of a many-minds interpretation of quantum theory. The analogy between mathematical ``existence'' and physical ``existence'' is considered from the point of view of philosophical idealism. Some of the ways in which infinitary mathematics arises in modern mathematical physics are discussed. Empirical science has led to the mathematics of quantum theory. This in turn can be taken to suggest a picture of reality involving possible minds and the physical laws which determine their probabilities. In this picture, finitary and infinitary mathematics play separate roles. It is argued that mind, language, and finitary mathematics have similar prerequisites, in that each depends on the possibility of possibilities. The infinite, on the other hand, can be described but never experienced, and yet it seems that sets of possibilities and the physical laws which define their probabilities can be described most simply in terms of infinitary mathematics.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Heller (1997). Essential Tension: Mathematics - Physics - Philosophy. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 2 (1):39-52.
Toshiyasu Arai (2002). Review: Wilfried Buchholz, Notation Systems for Infinitary Derivations ; Wilfried Buchholz, Explaining Gentzen's Consistency Proof Within Infinitary Proof Theory ; Sergei Tupailo, Finitary Reductions for Local Predicativity, I: Recursively Regular Ordinals. [REVIEW] Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (3):437-439.
Lawrence Sklar (1998). The Language of Nature is Mathematics—but Which Mathematics? And What Nature? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (3):241–261.
Alan Baker (2003). The Indispensability Argument and Multiple Foundations for Mathematics. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):49–67.
Michael Freund & Daniel Lehmann (1994). Nonmonotonic Reasoning: From Finitary Relations to Infinitary Inference Operations. Studia Logica 53 (2):161 - 201.
John L. Bell, Infinitary Logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Radhakrishnan Srinivasan, Platonism in Classical Logic Versus Formalism in the Proposed Non-Aristotelian Finitary Logic.
Thomas Strahm (2002). Review: Andreas Weiermann, How Is It That Infinitary Methods Can Be Applied to Finitary Mathematics? Gödel's T: A Case Study. [REVIEW] Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (3):435-436.
Ralf M. Bader (2012). Supervenience and Infinitary Property-Forming Operations. Philosophical Studies 160 (3):415-423.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #172,621 of 1,906,981 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #91,929 of 1,906,981 )
How can I increase my downloads?