Reciprocal altruism and the biological basis of ethics in Neo-Confucianism
Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 1 (2):131-141 (2002)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWilliam Theodore De Bary & Irene Bloom (eds.) (1979). Principle and Practicality: Essays in Neo-Confucianism and Practical Learning. Columbia University Press.
Mahesh Ananth (2005). Psychological Altruism Vs. Biological Altruism: Narrowing the Gap with the Baldwin Effect. Acta Biotheoretica 53 (3).
Edward T. Chʻien (1986). Chiao Hung and the Restructuring of Neo-Confucianism in the Late Ming. Columbia University Press.
William Theodore De Bary & JaHyun Kim Haboush (eds.) (1985). The Rise of Neo-Confucianism in Korea. Columbia University Press.
James H. Turner & Sean R. Valentine (2001). Cynicism as a Fundamental Dimension of Moral Decision-Making: A Scale Development. Journal of Business Ethics 34 (2):123 - 136.
Michael Gurven (2004). Tolerated Reciprocity, Reciprocal Scrounging, and Unrelated Kin: MaKing Sense of Multiple Models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):572-579.
Christopher Stephens (1996). Modelling Reciprocal Altruism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):533-551.
William Theodore De Bary (1981). Neo-Confucian Orthodoxy and the Learning of the Mind-and-Heart. Columbia University Press.
Grant Ramsey & Robert Brandon (2011). Why Reciprocal Altruism is Not a Kind of Group Selection. Biology and Philosophy 26 (3):385-400.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads2 ( #232,501 of 549,077 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
