Recent Criticisms of Russell's Analysis of Existence

Analysis 12 (6):132 - 137 (1952)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author discusses the criticisms of margaret macdonald and martin shearn. He also uses ryle's distinction between grammatical and logical subjects, Which sums up the discussion of whether or not existence is a predicate. (staff)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ayer and Russell on Naive Realism.Michael Bradie - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:175 - 181.
Russell’s Notion of Scope.Saul A. Kripke - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):1005-1037.
Particulars As Universals.Herbert Hochberg - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:83-111.
Existence predicate.Reinhard Muskens - 1993 - In R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon. pp. 1191.
Russell's Analysis of Existence.Martin Shearn - 1951 - Analysis 11 (6):124 - 131.
A new look at the cosmological argument.Robert C. Koons - 1997 - American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (2):193 - 211.
Russell on the Relations of Universals and Particulars.Larry Lee Blackman - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:265-278.
On remembering an unreal past.Andrew Naylor - 1966 - Analysis 26 (March):122-128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
62 (#250,399)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Margaret MacDonald’s scientific common-sense philosophy.Justin Vlasits - 2022 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 30 (2):267-287.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references