David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:289-301 (2003)
Scholars of Aquinas’s doctrine of analogy have traditionally devoted their attention to the question of which kind of analogy, that of proportionality or that of attribution, is the most relevant for Aquinas. However, a closer study of some of Aquinas’s crucial texts reveals that there are prior and more fundamental problems. A relevant difficulty concerns the characteristics of the focus of an analogical predication. A good understanding of what Aquinas means by the focusof an analogical predication requires four different steps. First, demonstrating whether the focus is a concept or an individual thing. Second, indicating whetherthe focus is in a causal relation with the other things involved in analogy. Third, establishing whether the focus involves an extrinsic or an intrinsic predication.Fourth, showing how the focus works when analogy is applied to the case of being. By examining the notion of the focus, we may learn of some of the originalfeatures of Aquinas’s doctrine of analogy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Victor Salas (2009). The Twofold Character of Thomas Aquinas's Analogy of Being. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):295-315.
Derek J. Morrow (2006). Aquinas, Marion, Analogy, and Esse. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):25-42.
Joshua P. Hochschild (2003). Did Aquinas Answer Cajetan's Question? Aquinas's Semantic Rules for Analogy and the Interpretation of De Nominum Analogia. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:273-288.
John P. O'Callaghan (2002). Aquinas, Cognitive Theory, and Analogy. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):451-482.
Joshua P. Hochschild (2005). The Rest of Cajetan's Analogy Theory. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):341-356.
Joshua P. Hochschild (2010). The Semantics of Analogy: Rereading Cajetan's De Nominum Analogia. University of Notre Dame Press.
Roger M. White (2009). Talking About God: The Concept of Analogy and the Problem of Religious Language. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
George Peter Klubertanz (1960). St. Thomas Aquinas on Analogy. Chicago, Loyola University Press.
Anthony Kenny (1980). Aquinas. Hill and Wang.
Anthony Kenny (1969). Aquinas. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
John Lamont (1997). Aquinas on Divine Simplicity. The Monist 80 (4):521-538.
Thomas Joseph White (2010). Through Him All Things Were Made" (John 1:3) : The Analogy of the Word Incarnate According to St. Thomas Aquinas and its Ontological Presuppositions. [REVIEW] In , The Analogy of Being: Invention of the Antichrist or the Wisdom of God? W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..
Anthony Kenny (1976). Aquinas: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Derek J. Morrow (2007). Aquinas According to the Horizon of Distance: Jean-Luc Marion's Phenomenological Reading of Thomistic Analogy. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1):59-77.
Claudio Antonio Testi (2010). Analogy and Formal Logic. Studia Neoaristotelica 7 (1):3-27.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads9 ( #163,591 of 1,099,961 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #190,060 of 1,099,961 )
How can I increase my downloads?