The vocation of motherhood: Husserl and feminist ethics [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):127-140 (2010)
In this paper, I explore a confrontation between Husserl’s ethical position of vocation and its absolute ought with a feminist ethical position. I argue that Husserl’s ethics has a great deal to offer a feminist ethics by providing for the possibility of an ethics that is particular rather than universal, that recognizes the role of the social through tradition in establishing values and norms without conceding the ethical responsibility of the individual, and that acknowledges the role of both reason and desire in establishing moral values that has the consequence of breaking down the public/private distinction that has reigned in so many ethical theories. In order to make this case, I proceed with a review of Husserl’s position of the absolute ought, some typical criticisms that might be leveled at his position, and finally, responses to those criticisms that show ways in which Husserl’s position can be beneficial to the formulation of a feminist ethics that is inclusive of the emotional aspect of moral valuation, and the particularity of ethical commitments, while providing for a different way of evaluating thinking that accommodates what are usually understood to be “feminine” concerns. In addition to describing Husserl’s position, I show how that position meets some of the expectations for a feminist ethics as put forth by Iris Marion Young and Sara Ruddick.
|Keywords||Motherhood Ethics Husserl Vocation Absolute ought Iris Young Feminist ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Edmund Husserl (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston,Northwestern University Press.
Ulrich Melle (1991). The Development of Husserl's Ethics. Études Phénoménologiques 7 (13-14):115-135.
Donn Welton (2001). The Other Husserl: The Horizons of Transcendental Phenomenology. Indiana University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Virginia Held (1999). Feminist Ethical Theory. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:41-49.
Virginia Held (1993). Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics. University of Chicago Press.
Michael Ruse (1984). Biological Science and Feminist Values. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:525 - 542.
Kristen Kennedy (1999). Hipparchia the Cynic: Feminist Rhetoric and the Ethics of Embodiment. Hypatia 14 (2):48-71.
Carol S. Robb (1981). A Framework for Feminist Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (1):48 - 68.
Alia Al-Saji (2010). Bodies and Sensings: On the Uses of Husserlian Phenomenology for Feminist Theory. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):13-37.
Margaret Urban Walker (2007). Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics. Oxford University Press.
James G. Hart (2006). The Absolute Ought and the Unique Individual. Husserl Studies 22 (3):223-240.
Nathan Nobis (2005). Feminist Ethics Without Feminist Ethical Theory (Or, More Generally, “Φ Ethics Without Φ Ethical Theory”). Journal of Philosophical Research 30 (Supplement):213-225.
Samantha Brennan (1999). Reconciling Feminist Politics and Feminist Ethics on the Issue of Rights. Journal of Social Philosophy 30 (2):260–275.
Added to index2010-04-17
Total downloads33 ( #55,791 of 1,099,914 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #24,108 of 1,099,914 )
How can I increase my downloads?