Graduate studies at Western
OUP Oxford (2011)
|Abstract||Zoopolis offers a new agenda for the theory and practice of animal rights. Most animal rights theory focuses on the intrinsic capacities or interests of animals, and the moral status and moral rights that these intrinsic characteristics give rise to. Zoopolis shifts the debate from the realm of moral theory and applied ethics to the realm of political theory, focusing on the relational obligations that arise from the varied ways that animals relate to human societies and institutions. Building on recent developments in the political theory of group-differentiated citizenship, Zoopolis introduces us to the genuine "political animal". It argues that different types of animals stand in different relationships to human political communities. Domesticated animals should be seen as full members of human-animal mixed communities, participating in the cooperative project of shared citizenship. Wilderness animals, by contrast, form their own sovereign communities entitled to protection against colonization, invasion, domination and other threats to self-determination. `Liminal' animals who are wild but live in the midst of human settlement (such as crows or raccoons) should be seen as "denizens", resident of our societies, but not fully included in rights and responsibilities of citizenship. To all of these animals we owe respect for their basic inviolable rights. But we inevitably and appropriately have very different relations with them, with different types of obligations. Humans and animals are inextricably bound in a complex web of relationships, and Zoopolis offers an original and profoundly affirmative vision of how to ground this complex web of relations on principles of justice and compassion.|
|Keywords||Animal rights Human-animal relationships Moral and ethical aspects Politische Theorie Tierethik|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$19.86 used (34% off) $26.17 new (13% off) $26.99 direct from Amazon (10% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||HV4708.D662 2011|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mark Rowlands (2009). Animal Rights: Moral Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Claire Molloy (2011). Popular Media and Animals. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kelly Oliver (2010). Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness. Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Mylan Engel (2010). The Philosophy of Animal Rights: A Brief Introduction for Students and Teachers. Lantern Books.
David DeGrazia (2002). Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Francine L. Dolins (ed.) (1999). Attitudes to Animals: Views in Animal Welfare. Cambridge University Press.
Cary Wolfe (2013). Before the Law: Humans and Other Animals in a Biopolitical Frame. The University of Chicago Press.
Mark Rowlands (1998). Animal Rights: A Philosophical Defence. St. Martin's Press.
Joel Marks (2010). Live Free or Die. [REVIEW] Animal Law 17 (1):243-250.
Wesley J. Smith (2009). A Rat is a Pig is a Dog is a Boy: The Human Cost of the Animal Rights Movement. Encounter Books.
Marna A. Owen (2009). Animal Rights: Noble Cause or Needless Effort? Twenty-First Century Books.
Kay Peggs (2012). Animals and Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rainer Ebert & Tibor R. Machan (2012). Innocent Threats and the Moral Problem of Carnivorous Animals. Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (2):146-159.
Peter Carruthers (1992). The Animals Issue: Moral Theory in Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2012-04-15
Total downloads24 ( #57,941 of 739,444 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,444 )
How can I increase my downloads?