Pollution, profits, and stakeholders: The constraining effect of economic performance on CEO concern with stakeholder expectations [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 13 (9):701 - 711 (1994)
This study examined the constraining effect of economic performance on the relationship between CEO stakeholder orientations and four pollution performance categories. Economic performance was found to moderate the relationship for two of the four categories. Additionally economic performance was found to consistently interact with some CEO stakeholder orientations and not others. Overall the results suggest that CEO concern with stakeholder expectations is in large part moderate by the economic performance of the firm.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Min-Dong Paul Lee (2011). Configuration of External Influences: The Combined Effects of Institutions and Stakeholders on Corporate Social Responsibility Strategies. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 102 (2):281-298.
Heather R. Dixon-Fowler, Daniel J. Slater, Jonathan L. Johnson, Alan E. Ellstrand & Andrea M. Romi (2013). Beyond “Does It Pay to Be Green?” A Meta-Analysis of Moderators of the CEP–CFP Relationship. Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2):353-366.
Elisabeth Albertini (2013). A Descriptive Analysis of Environmental Disclosure: A Longitudinal Study of French Companies. Journal of Business Ethics:1-22.
Similar books and articles
Lorne N. Switzer & Catherine Kelly (2006). Corporate Governance Mechanisms and the Performance of Small-Cap Firms in Canada. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2 (s 3-4):294-328.
Bernadette M. Ruf, Krishnamurty Muralidhar, Robert M. Brown, Jay J. Janney & Karen Paul (2001). An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 32 (2):143 - 156.
Daniel J. Slater & Heather R. Dixon-Fowler (2009). Ceo International Assignment Experience and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (3):473 - 489.
Jeffrey S. Harrison & Joseph E. Coombs (2012). The Moderating Effects From Corporate Governance Characteristics on the Relationship Between Available Slack and Community-Based Firm Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (4):409-422.
Brian Harvey & Anja Schaefer (2001). Managing Relationships with Environmental Stakeholders: A Study of U.K. Water and Electricity Utilities. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 30 (3):243 - 260.
Pascual Berrone, Jordi Surroca & Josep A. Tribó (2007). Corporate Ethical Identity as a Determinant of Firm Performance: A Test of the Mediating Role of Stakeholder Satisfaction. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 76 (1):35 - 53.
Donald Nichols & Chandra Subramaniam (2001). Executive Compensation: Excessive or Equitable? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 29 (4):339 - 351.
Jean McGuire, Sandra Dow & Kamal Argheyd (2003). CEO Incentives and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 45 (4):341 - 359.
Mel Perel (2003). An Ethical Perspective on CEO Compensation. Journal of Business Ethics 48 (4):381-391.
Jia Wang & H. Dudley Dewhirst (1992). Boards of Directors and Stakeholder Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):115 - 123.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #434,761 of 1,099,024 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #287,293 of 1,099,024 )
How can I increase my downloads?