Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42 (2):295-316 (2011)
|Abstract||I defend a realist commitment to the truth of our most empirically successful current scientific theories—on the ground that it provides the best explanation of their success and the success of their falsified predecessors. I argue that this Best Current Theory Realism (BCTR) is superior to preservative realism (PR) and the structural realism (SR). I show that PR and SR rest on the implausible assumption that the success of outdated theories requires the realist to hold that these theories possessed truthful components. PR is undone by the fact that past theories succeeded even though their ontological claims about unobservables are false. SR backpeddles to argue that the realist is only committed to the truth about the structure of relations implied by the outdated theory, in order to explain its success. I argue that the structural component of theories is too bare-bones thin to explain the predictive/explanatory success of outdated theories. I conclude that BCTR can meet these objections to PR and SR, and also overcome the pessimistic meta-induction|
|Keywords||Preservative realism Structural realism Inference-to-the-best-explanation The empirical success of science Pessimistic meta-induction Best-current-theory realism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gerald Doppelt (2007). Reconstructing Scientific Realism to Rebut the Pessimistic Meta-Induction. Philosophy of Science 74 (1):96-118.
Gerald Doppelt (2013). Explaining the Success of Science: Kuhn and Scientific Realists. Topoi 32 (1):43-51.
Gerald Doppelt, Does Structural Realism Provide the Best Explanation of the Predictive Success of Science?
Gerald Doppelt (2005). Empirical Success or Explanatory Success: What Does Current Scientific Realism Need to Explain? Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1076-1087.
Ludwig Fahrbach (2011). Theory Change and Degrees of Success. Philosophy of Science 78 (5):1283-1292.
Jarrett Leplin (1982). The Historical Objection to Scientific Realism. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:88 - 97.
Jacob Busch (2011). Scientific Realism and the Indispensability Argument for Mathematical Realism: A Marriage Made in Hell. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (4):307-325.
Holger Lyre (2010). Humean Perspectives on Structural Realism. In F. Stadler (ed.), The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science. Springer.
John Worrall (2011). Underdetermination, Realism and Empirical Equivalence. Synthese 180 (2):157 - 172.
Jeffrey Ketland (2004). Empirical Adequacy and Ramsification. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):287-300.
Added to index2011-10-18
Total downloads70 ( #15,011 of 722,703 )
Recent downloads (6 months)26 ( #4,849 of 722,703 )
How can I increase my downloads?