Inquiry 21 (1-4):33 – 86 (1978)
|Abstract||This article attempts to develop a rational reconstruction of Kuhn's epistemological relativism which effectively defends it against an influential line of criticism in the work of Shapere and Scheffler. Against the latter's reading of Kuhn, it is argued (1) that it is the incommensurability of scientific problems, data, and standards, not that of scientific meanings which primarily grounds the relativism argument; and (2) that Kuhnian incommensurability is compatible with far greater epistemological continuity from one theory to another than is implied by the criticisms in question. The reconstruction of Kuhn is then used to show that while it constitutes a provocative form of relativism, it can also plausibly account for the sense in which scientific development is rational, involves standards external to particular paradigms, and exhibits progress of a sort. Finally, the article attempts to develop an adequate critical perspective on Kuhn's relativism by distinguishing a ?short?run? from a ?long?run? relativism, and a relativism concerning scientific knowledge from one concerning scientific rationality in Kuhn; the challenge each poses to positi?vist philosophy of science is distinguished and separately evaluated|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
William E. Stempsey (1995). Incommensurability: Its Implications for the Patient/Physician Relation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (3).
John Tresch (2001). On Going Native: Thomas Kuhn and Anthropological Method. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (3):302-322.
Hervé Barreau (2008). Historical and Transcendental Factors in the Construction of the Sciences. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):33-47.
K. Brad Wray (2011). Kuhn's Evolutionary Social Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.
Maria Baghramian (2004). Relativism. Routledge.
Bojana Mladenović (2007). "Muckraking in History": The Role of the History of Science in Kuhn's Philosophy. Perspectives on Science 15 (3):261-294.
Harmon R. Holcomb Iii (1987). Circularity and Inconsistency in Kuhn's Defense of Relativism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):467-480.
Xiang Chen (1997). Thomas Kuhn's Latest Notion of Incommensurability. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28 (2):257-273.
Gerald Doppelt (1980). Ii. A Reply to Siegel on Kuhnian Relativism. Inquiry 23 (1):117 – 123.
Harvey Siegel (1980). I. Epistemological Relativism in its Latest Form. Inquiry 23 (1):107 – 117.
Added to index2009-01-30
Total downloads79 ( #9,956 of 549,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #7,802 of 549,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?