The Austin-Malcolm argument for the incorrigibility of perceptual reports

Dialectica 33 (1):59-75 (1979)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Epistemology  Falsification  Knowledge  Physicalism  Austin  Malcolm, N
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Mark Kaplan (2000). To What Must an Epistemology Be True? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):279-304.
    Norman Malcolm (1959). Stern's Dreaming. Analysis 19 (December):47.
    Norman Malcolm (1965). Understanding Austin. Journal of Philosophy 62 (19):508-509.
    Richard H. Robinson (1972). The Concept of Incorrigibility. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (June):427-441.
    K. Stern (1959). Malcolm's Dreaming. Analysis 19 (December):44-46.
    John E. Atwell (1966). Austin on Incorrigibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (December):261-266.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2009-01-28

    Total downloads

    15 ( #90,364 of 1,088,810 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,735 of 1,088,810 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.