Between the old metaphysics and the new empiricism: Collingwood's defence of the autonomy of philosophy
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ratio 25 (1):34-50 (2012)
Collingwood has failed to make a significant impact in the history of twentieth century philosophy either because he has been dismissed as a dusty old idealist committed to the very metaphysics the analytical school was trying to leave behind, or because his later work has been interpreted as advocating the dissolution of philosophy into history. I argue that Collingwood's key philosophical works are a sustained attempt to defend the view that philosophy is an autonomous discipline with a distinctive domain of inquiry and that Collingwood's attempt to defend the autonomy of philosophy is intimately connected to his defence of intensional notions against the kind of meaning scepticism which came to prevail from the 1920s. I defend the philosophical claim that there is a third way between the idealist metaphysics with which Collingwood is often associated and the neo-empiricist agenda which characterised analytic philosophy in mid-century by defending the hermeneutic thesis that Collingwood's work is a sustained attempt to articulate a conception of philosophy as an epistemologically first science. Since there is a via media between the old metaphysics and the new empiricism there is no need to choose between a certain kind of armchair metaphysics and a scientifically informed ontology
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Giuseppina D'Oro (2000). On Collingwood's Rehabilitation of the Ontological Argument. Idealistic Studies 30 (3):173-188.
Rex Martin (1989). Collingwood's Claim That Metaphysics is a Historical Discipline. The Monist 72 (4):489-525.
R. G. Collingwood (2005/2000). An Essay on Philosophical Method. Oxford University Press.
Gary K. Browning (2004). Rethinking R.G. Collingwood: Philosophy, Politics, and the Unity of Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Karim Dharamsi (2008). From Norms to Uses and Back Again. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):167-184.
John Luckman (1991). Metaphysics, History and the Unpublished Manuscripts. International Studies in Philosophy 23 (3):27-45.
Tim Lord (2012). Collingwood and the Sea Anemone. Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 17 (1):117-134.
Kenneth B. McIntyre (2008). Historicity as Methodology or Hermeneutics: Collingwood's Influence on Skinner and Gadamer. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):138-166.
J. N. Hartt (1953). Metaphysics, History, and Civilization: Collingwood's Account of Their Interrelationships. Journal of Religion 33:198-211.
Dimitris Vardoulakis (2006). Total Imagination and Ontology in R. G. Collingwood. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2):303 – 322.
Giuseppina D'Oro (2005). Idealism and the Philosophy of Mind. Inquiry 48 (5):395-412.
Raymun Festin (2005). At the Crossroads of Historiography and Metaphysics of History. Idealistic Studies 35 (1):35-47.
Stephen Leach (2011). History, Ethics and Philosophy: Bernard Williams Appraisal of R. G. Collingwood. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (1):36-53.
Added to index2012-02-11
Total downloads28 ( #71,862 of 1,410,434 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #107,949 of 1,410,434 )
How can I increase my downloads?