Collingwood on re-enactment and the identity of thought
Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (1):87-101 (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDavid Oldroyd (1999). Non-Written Sources in the Study of the History of Geology: Pros and Cons, in the Light of the Views of Collingwood and Foucault. Annals of Science 56 (4):395-415.
E. Weinryb (1989). Re-Enactment in Retrospect. The Monist 72 (4):568-580.
R. G. Collingwood (2005/2000). An Essay on Philosophical Method. Oxford University Press.
P. Gardiner (1952). The 'Object' of Historical Knowledge. Philosophy 27 (102):211-220.
William H. Dray (1995). History as Re-Enactment: R.G. Collingwood's Idea of History. Oxford University Press.
Stephen Turner (2011). Collingwood and Weber Vs. Mink: History After the Cognitive Turn. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (2):230-260.
Philip Smallwood (2000). Historical Re-Enactment, Literary Transmission, and the Value of R. G. Collingwood. Translation and Literature 9:3-24.
Dimitrios Vardoulakis (2004). The Vicissitude of Completeness: Gadamer's Criticism of Collingwood. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (1):3 – 19.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads10 ( #106,476 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
