David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 163 (3):591-610 (2013)
This paper offers a critical assessment of the current state of the debate about the identity and individuality of material objects. Its main aim, in particular, is to show that, in a sense to be carefully specified, the opposition between the Leibnizian ‘reductionist’ tradition, based on discernibility, and the sort of ‘primitivism’ that denies that facts of identity and individuality must be analysable has become outdated. In particular, it is argued that—contrary to a widespread consensus—‘naturalised’ metaphysics supports both the acceptability of non-qualitatively grounded (both ‘contextual’ and intrinsic) identity and a pluralistic approach to individuality and individuation. A case study is offered that focuses on non-relativistic quantum mechanics, in the context of which primitivism about identity and individuality, rather than being regarded as unscientific, is on the contrary suggested to be preferable to the complicated forms of reductionism that have recently been proposed. More generally, by assuming a plausible form of anti-reductionism about scientific theories and domains, it is claimed that science can be regarded as compatible with, or even as suggesting, the existence of a series of equally plausible grades of individuality. The kind of individuality that prevails in a certain context and at a given level can be ascertained only on the basis of the specific scientific theory at hand
|Keywords||Individuality Discernibility Identity Reductionism Primitivism Contextualism Quantum mechanics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert W. Batterman (2002). The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence. Oxford University Press.
Simon Saunders (2006). Are Quantum Particles Objects? Analysis 66 (289):52–63.
F. A. Muller & Simon Saunders (2008). Discerning Fermions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):499-548.
James Ladyman & Tomasz Bigaj (2010). The Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles and Quantum Mechanics. Philosophy of Science 77 (1):117-136.
F. A. Muller & M. P. Seevinck (2009). Discerning Elementary Particles. Philosophy of Science 76 (2):179-200.
Citations of this work BETA
Tuomas E. Tahko (forthcoming). Fundamentality and Ontological Minimality. In Ricki Bliss & Graham Priest (eds.), Reality and its Structure. Oxford University Press
Mauro Dorato (forthcoming). The Physical World as a Blob: Is OSR Really Realism? [REVIEW] Metascience:1-9.
Vincent Lam (2014). Entities Without Intrinsic Physical Identity. Erkenntnis 79 (5):1157-1171.
Anjan Chakravartty (forthcoming). Particles, Causation, and the Metaphysics of Structure. Synthese:1-17.
Tomasz Bigaj (2015). On Discernibility and Symmetries. Erkenntnis 80 (1):117-135.
Similar books and articles
Jonas R. Becker Arenhart (2012). Many Entities, No Identity. Synthese 187 (2):801-812.
Matteo Morganti (2011). Identity in Physics: Statistics and the (Non-)Individuality of Quantum Particles. In H. De Regt, S. Hartmann & S.: Okasha (eds.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer
Jonas Rafael Becker Arenhart & Décio Krause (2013). Why Non-Individuality? A Discussion on Individuality, Identity, and Cardinality in the Quantum Context. Erkenntnis (1):1-18.
Steven French (2006). Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis. Oxford University Press.
Johanna Seibt (1996). Non-Countable Individuals. Southwest Philosophy Review 12 (1):225-236.
Robert C. Hilborn & Candice L. Yuca (2002). Identical Particles in Quantum Mechanics Revisited. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (3):355-389.
Décio Krause (2010). Logical Aspects of Quantum (Non-)Individuality. Foundations of Science 15 (1):79-94.
Jack Wilson (1999). Biological Individuality: The Identity and Persistence of Living Entities. Cambridge University Press.
Graciela Domenech & Federico Holik (2007). A Discussion on Particle Number and Quantum Indistinguishability. Foundations of Physics 37 (6):855-878.
Peter King (1994). Buridan's Theory of Individuation. In Jorge J. E. Gracia (ed.), Individuation in Scholasticism. The Later Middle Ages and the Counter-Reformation, 1150-1650. 397-430.
Hans-Georg Moeller (2004). New Confucianism and the Semantics of Individuality. A Luhmannian Analysis. Asian Philosophy 14 (1):25 – 39.
Marc Ereshefsky & Makmiller Pedroso (2013). Biological Individuality: The Case of Biofilms. Biology and Philosophy 28 (2):331-349.
Steven French (1989). Identity and Individuality in Classical and Quantum Physics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67 (4):432 – 446.
Steven French, Identity and Individuality in Quantum Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Steven French (2011). Shifting to Structures in Physics and Biology: A Prophylactic for Promiscuous Realism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 42 (2):164-173.
Added to index2011-10-31
Total downloads434 ( #2,776 of 1,902,209 )
Recent downloads (6 months)40 ( #21,405 of 1,902,209 )
How can I increase my downloads?