Henry Cavendish's deduction of the electrostatic inverse square law from the result of a single experiment
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 4 (4):327-348 (1974)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRonald Laymon (1994). Demonstrative Induction, Old and New Evidence and the Accuracy of the Electrostatic Inverse Square Law. Synthese 99 (1):23 - 58.
Stewart Duncan (2012). Debating Materialism: Cavendish, Hobbes, and More. History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (4):391-409.
Sarah Hutton (2003). Margaret Cavendish and Henry More. In Stephen Clucas (ed.), A Princely Brave Woman: Essays on Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle. Ashgate.
Thomas Bonk (1997). Newtonian Gravity, Quantum Discontinuity and the Determination of Theory by Evidence. Synthese 112 (1):53-73.
Maria Lasonen-Aarnio (2008). Single Premise Deduction and Risk. Philosophical Studies 141 (2):157 - 173.
Konstantin Pollok (2008). 'An Almost Single Inference' – Kant's Deduction of the Categories Reconsidered. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90 (3).
Henry E. Allison (1993). Apperception and Analyticity in the B-Deduction. Grazer Philosophische Studien 44:233-252.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-02Total downloads10 ( #106,438 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
