David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Perspectives on Science 8 (3):223-254 (2000)
: Half a century of political Marxism and Soviet social science deflected Marxist thought from its canonical sources. Communism and Marxism were so intertwined by events of the twentieth century that it is difficult to see what remains of the latter after the demise of the former. Specifically, three foundational principles--"being determines consciousness," the Asiatic Mode of Production, and "the ideas of the ruling class are the ruling ideas"--have been corrupted by heartfelt ideological commitments. A review of those principles against the background of Marxist writing on the history of science stakes out research frontiers that remain to be reconnoitered
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
S. Shapin (1982). L'histoire des Sciences Est-Elle Possible. History of Science 20:157-211.
Dirk J. Struik (1948). Marx and Mathematics. Science and Society 12 (1):181 - 196.
Robert K. Merton (1939). Science and the Economy of Seventeenth Century England. Science and Society 3 (1):3 - 27.
Jerome Ravetz & Richard Westfall (1981). Marxism and the History of Science. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 72:393-405.
Francesca Bray (1996). Eloge: Joseph Needham, 9 December 1900-24 March 1995. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 87:312-317.
Citations of this work BETA
P. Dear (2003). The Ideology of Modern Science - Openness, Secrecy, Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge From Antiquity to the Renaissance Pamela O. Long; the Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, 2001, Pp. XII+364, Price £38.00 Hardback, ISBN 0-8018-6606-. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (4):821-828.
Similar books and articles
Kang Ouyang (2006). Globalization and the Contemporary Development of Marxist Philosophy: Precondition, Problem Domain and Research Outline. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (4):643-657.
Marcel Van Der Linden (1997). Marx and Engels, Dutch Marxism and the "Model Capitalist Nation of the Seventeenth Century". Science and Society 61 (2):161 - 193.
Valentín A. Bazhanov (2008). Social Milieu and Evolution of Logic, Epistemology, and the History of Science: The Case of Marxism. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):157-169.
Gregory Blue (1998). Joseph Needham, Heterodox Marxism and the Social Background to Chinese Science. Science and Society 62 (2):195 - 217.
Ping He (2007). On the Phenomenon of “Return to Marx” in China. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):219-229.
Edwin A. Roberts (2005). From the History of Science to the Science of History: Scientists and Historians in the Shaping of British Marxist Theory. Science and Society 69 (4):529 - 558.
Richard Hudelson (2006). Marx for the Present. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (1):105-115.
Hongmei Qu (2011). Marxism and Morality: Reflections on the History of Interpreting Marx in Moral Philosophy. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):239-257.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #238,748 of 1,789,791 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #261,181 of 1,789,791 )
How can I increase my downloads?