Manuscrito 34 (1):185-204 (2011)
|Abstract||In this paper I analyze the difficult question of the truth of mature scientific theories by tackling the problem of the truth of laws. After introducing the main philosophical positions in the field of scientific realism, I discuss and then counter the two main arguments against realism, namely the pessimistic metainduction and the abstract and idealized character of scientific laws. I conclude by defending the view that well-confirmed physical theories are true only relatively to certain values of the variables that appear in the laws|
|Keywords||Truth, Laws, Progress, Commensurability|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Renat Nugayev (1991). The Fundamental Laws of Physics Can Tell the Truth. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (1):79 – 87.
Robert E. Seall (1963). Truth-Valued Fluents and Qualitative Laws. Philosophy of Science 30 (1):36-40.
David Spurrett (2001). Cartwright on Laws and Composition. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (3):253 – 268.
Jens Harbecke (2011). Mind in a Humean World. Metaphysica 12 (2):213-229.
Marc Lange (2000). Natural Laws in Scientific Practice. Oxford University Press.
Mehmet Elgin (2003). Biology and A Priori Laws. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1380-1389.
R. Vihalemm (2003). Are Laws of Nature and Scientific Theories Peculiar in Chemistry? Scrutinizing Mendeleev's Discovery. Foundations of Chemistry 5 (1):7-22.
Dirk Greimann (2008). Does Frege Use a Truth-Predicate in His ‘Justification’ of the Laws of Logic? A Comment on Weiner. Mind 117 (466):403-425.
Richard Corry (2006). Causal Realism and the Laws of Nature. Philosophy of Science 73 (3):261-276.
Mauro Dorato (2012). Mathematical Biology and the Existence of Biological Laws. In DieksD (ed.), Probabilities, Laws and Structure. Springer.
Added to index2012-02-29
Total downloads25 ( #50,423 of 556,898 )
Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #3,896 of 556,898 )
How can I increase my downloads?