Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):680-681 (1999)
|Abstract||This commentary focuses on Findlay & Walker's model and more specifically, on its underestimation of the role of cognitive processes in eye movement control during complex activities such as text scanning. In particular, the issue of the complexity of the subject's task/behavior is discussed to stress the importance of the link between selection for perceptual processing on the one hand, and the selection of a target for a saccade, on the other. Future models will have to account for the fact that the goal of any saccade is to bring the eyes to a relevant object and that the selection of this saccade target is closely related to object recognition.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael C. Dorris & Douglas P. Munoz (1999). The Underrated Role of the “Move System” in Determining Saccade Latency. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):681-682.
Ralph Radach, Heiner Deubel & Dieter Heller (2003). Attention, Saccade Programming, and the Timing of Eye-Movement Control. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):497-498.
Cécile Beauvillain (1999). Change in Motor Plan with a Change in the Selection of the to-Be-Recognized Word. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):674-675.
Ronan Reilly & Ralph Radach (2003). Methodologies for Comparing Complex Computational Models of Eye-Movement Control in Reading: Just Fitting the Data is Not Enough. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):499-500.
Diane C. Gooding (1999). The Role of Executive Control in Saccade Generation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):686-687.
Wu Zhou & W. M. King (1999). Monocular and Binocular Mechanisms in Saccade Generation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):704-705.
Ralf Engbert & Reinhold Kliegl (2003). The Game of Word Skipping: Who Are the Competitors? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):481-482.
Françoise Vitu (1999). About Saccade Generation in Reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):702-703.
Erik D. Reichle, Keith Rayner & Alexander Pollatsek (2003). The E-Z Reader Model of Eye-Movement Control in Reading: Comparisons to Other Models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):445-476.
Cécile Beauvillain & Pierre Pouget (2003). How Can Selection-for-Perception Be Decoupled From Selection-for-Action? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):478-479.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?